Skip to content

Rules

Rules are how ClaimPod decides what a person needs to look at. They are the difference between reviewing every claim and reviewing the few that a rule stopped.

Each rule pairs a condition with an outcome, and fires at a named point in the workflow. A claim review rule runs when a claim is checked. A remittance rule runs when a remittance arrives. The rule decides whether what it found is worth a person’s attention, and how loudly.

Not every finding stops a claim. Some block it outright, and some are advisory: worth reading, not worth halting for. This is what lets a clean claim promote itself to Ready without anyone opening it, while a genuinely questionable one waits.

Rules live in the client’s configuration rather than in the product, so they can be changed for one client without changing anyone else’s. A rule that does not suit a client is switched off rather than deleted, which keeps its history and lets it come back.

For most triggers a rule change applies from the next evaluation: the next import, readiness check or statement. Claim Review is the exception, because a claim waiting to be sent should be judged by the rules it will go out under. Creating an active Claim Review rule, a save that changes what one decides, deleting an active one, applying a library update to it, and activating, deactivating or deleting several at once all start a re-check of every Draft and Ready claim. A rename or a priority change does not.

The re-check only judges. A Ready claim that now has a blocking finding goes back to Draft, a Draft claim’s findings are refreshed, and nothing moves forward on its own. A Ready claim held by an export batch is left as it is.

Claims already sent are never re-judged, and their findings are not rewritten. That is deliberate: a finding on a sent claim records what was true when it went out, and quietly rewriting history would make the audit trail useless.

Related: Rules · The Claim Loop · Check and Fix a Claim